11-03-2020 “COPIES OF THE FIRST LETTERS.” HERE IS THE DRAFT AS WE PUT UP THE NEW FRONT PAGE, IS CONSTANTLY UPDATED, YOU GET COPIES OF LETTERS AND ATTACHMENTS IN HIGH QUALITY. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE EEL CALL THE VICTIM OF JYSKE BANK’S FRAUD OPERATIONS ON +4522227713
As you can see here are a few letters to Lundgren’s lawyers about the fraud case against the Danish bank Jyske bank, try to look through letters and then ask yourself if there is corruption in Denmark’s largest law firms and and Danish banks.
Som du kan se er her er par brev til Lundgrens advokat partner selskab omkring svig sagen i mod den danske bank Jyske bank A/S, prøv at se breve igennem og spørg så dig selv, om der findes korruption i Danmarks største advokatvirksomheder og og danske banker.
See appendix we believe supports that Jyske bank in Denmark has paid return commission – bribe to Lundgren’s lawyers for not presenting some of our claims against Jyske Bank, English texts appear on all pictures that come much more, since it no longer only is a case of fraud as it is written in all emails and written to Lundgren’s lawyer partner company
In the case BS-402/2015-VIB Where, among others, Thomas Schioldan Sørensen of Rödstenen lawyers, and lawyer and partner Dan Terkildsen of Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, in bad faith have countered their client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S
For deliberate and continued gross fraud was never filed by the client’s attorneys.
The client believes that both Rödstenen and Lundgrens have worked for Jyske bank in order to disappoint in legal matters.
By not presenting the client’s claims to the court.
The period during which Rödstenen and Lundgrens have countered their client’s case and claims, have been presented to the court, is during the period between February 2016 and until September 2019
Where the client is forced to fire Lundgren’s lawyers after discovering that Lundgrens, has worked for Jyske bank A/S in a 3 digit million trade.
And therefore have been incompetent, and corrupt.
The client is compelled to present the final litigation, which is 28/10/2019
If you cannot understand Lundgrens or Rödstenen’s attorneys have not submitted the client’s claims, so you can ask.
Rödstenen +45 86 12 19 99
Lundgrens +45 35 25 25 35
Why the client should act as a lawyer himself, and make his final defense, as both Rödstenen Thomas Schioldan Sørensen and Lundgren’s Dan Terkildsen should be the client’s lawyer.
The client is personally obliged to present the closing litigation 28-10-2019 according to which their lawyers have taken care of Jyske bank’s interests.
And probably to disappoint in legal matters neither Rödstenen nor Lundgrens, submit any of the client’s claims against Jyske Bank A/S.
If you cannot understand Lundgrens and Rödstenen’s attorneys, and why these law firms, directly against the client’s continuous instructions, have not presented any of the client’s claims against Jyske bank A/S.
Then you can ask them yourself
Rödstenen +45 86 12 19 99 and Lundgrens +45 35 25 25 35
Just ask why the client himself should act as a lawyer, and even had to make the closing defense.
Since neither Rödstenen by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen and Lundgrens by Dan Terkildsen would be the client’s lawyer.
You can find the draft for the new front page that comes on the bank here.
When we look at all the inquiries to our attorneys, we look at the mails and letters, we have written since February 2016 to Rödstenen’s attorneys Thomas Schioldan Sørensen.
And to Lundgren’s attorneys Dan Terkildsen, until we fired them in September 2019.
It is clear that both law firms has had an financial interests with Jyske Bank A/S certainly with Board member Philip Baruch from Lund Elmer Sandager as between man.
But Dan Terkildsen believes, that everything are conspiracy theories, at the same time Philip Baruch strongly take distances from the fact that bribery between Jyske Bank A/S and Lundgrens took place.
The question is just what the hell did Jyske Bank’s group have to hire Lundgrens for.
When Jyske bank’s lawyer Philip Baruch Lund Elmer Sandager, knew that Lundgrens had come on as our lawyer.
We do not hide anything, and would like to talk about this here, therefore we play with open cards.
The question is whether there are some, who can trust the Danish banks as we here provide evidence of operating fraudulent bank, and deliberately lying, and conceal the truth.
Yes even to the seat, Jyske Bank board member Philip Baruch is lying at the same time that Lund Elmer Sandager is presenting manipulated evidence to disappoint in legal matters.
If we are wrong why no one will talk to us at all.
Don’t you see we actually want to have a dialogue with Jyske bank’s board of directors.
Call and +4522227713
And let’s meet as adults.
And you just have to go through the case with us.
If we are wrong then there is nothing we would rather do, than bring the case against Jyske bank for fraud and false.
And bring the chase out of court again
because we don’t think this is hilarious.
Unless Lundgrens has not countered their client's case in being presented to court, we believe there is bribery. The big question now is rather. How much does Jyske Bank A / S have Paid Lundgren's lawyers. Not to submit any of our claims against Jyske Bank A / S. Do we have a bribery case here? - The most common definition is: "a payment intended to cause someone to do something dishonest, illegal or contrary to his or her duties for the purpose of obtaining an unjustified benefit". - If this is not the case for Jyske Bank A / S active bribery, when the bank has offered, Lundgren's lawyer partner company to do a million work for Jyske Bank A / S - And if there is no passive bribery for Lundgrens Advokat partner company, accept a million assignment from Jyske bank A / S if the purpose is to override that our claims against Jyske Bank A / S are never presented. - WHAT IS THIS HERE
Pligt-forsømmelse,en. (jf. -forsømmende samt -forglemmelse; især emb.) undladelse af at gøre sin pligt; forsømmelse af ens pligter, navnlig: ens embedspligter
Vidste Bestyrelsen i Lundgrens, ikke at Jyske bank A/S udsatte deres klient for bedrageri, da Lundgrens valgte at arbejde for Jyske Bank A/S. kunne Lundgrens på nogen måde misforstå det klienten, bad Lundgrens advokater om at fremlægge for rette. det handler om din retssikkerhed, hvis der findes korrupte advokater i Danmark.
Here are the first letters that Lundgrens did not want to answer.
Trying to put them in date order so you can follow, around allegations to be made and witnesses to be summoned, Lundgrens 100% counteracts their client here in the case in order to disappoint in legal matters.
In Denmark, some of the largest criminal organizations, such as the Danske Bank Jyske Bank A/S, choose to make fraud crimes against their own customers.
While the group’s powerful political friends have certainly banned the police, the state attorney, the Ministry of Justice from interfering.
When banks like here Jyske Bank A/S with the group management and in the saddle unit CEO Anders Christian Dam.
Who are consciously and openly behind the bank’s continued fraud against small business customer, who just want to get in touch and get in dialogue with Jyske Bank’s Board of Directors for help to settle the matter.
Unfortunately no authorities will talk or help us, since Jyske Bank’s Group and Management obviously has been able to buy our latest 2 Lawyers, as the company, Rödstenen by Thomas Schioldan Sørensen and Lundgren’s lawyer partner company, by partner Dan Terkildsen.
We cannot find other explanations that both attorneys, Dan Terkildsen and Thomas Schioldan Sørensen, against the client’s instructions, have not submitted any of the client’s fraud allegations against Jyske Bank A/S.
The way Thomas Schioldan Sørensen has behaved several times, seen in the rearview mirror, has been to help Jyske Bank’s group disappoint in legal matters.
If you have another explanation then we would love to hear from you, and still on phone 004522227713 so we can correct these postings, that you as a reader should be able to trust that Banknyt.dk “Banking News” only writes the truth.
If you have any questions about Jyske Bank, please use this number 004589898989 as the management will hardly be disturbed with such small matters.
Can say, this is something of an odd strength relationship, the only thing we can do right now, while our new lawyer is getting started, after Rödstenen and Lundgren’s lawyers.
Is to write the truth about the men of power in Denmark.
And that the words
MED LOV SKAL MAN LAND BYGGE
WITH LAW MUST LAND BUILD / with law you shall country build. a well-known phrase on the court house has faded a lot.
You are very welcome to follow up on the case against Jyske Bank Case No. BS-402/2015-VIB
13-09-2019 when Dan Terkildsen Lundgren’s attorneys, who should be the client’s lawyer, against Jyske bank A/S counteract the client’s claims are also presented to the court.
Velkommen til jyske bank
FØLG SAGEN MOD JYSKE BANK FOR SVIG & FALSK
BEDRAGERI OG UDNYTTELSE IMOD BANKENS KUNDER
Har jyske bank løjet, for at lave og fortsætte bedrageri mod kunde
Og sender jyske bank kunden til afvikling grundet at banken lyver og bedrager kunde.
Spærre derefter kunders konti, for at få “frivillige” underskrifter på salgsfuldmagter, uden kundens første påskrevet advokat forbehold
En sag som starter med spørgsmål 1.
Bevis vi har lånt de 4.328.000 kr. Som banken skrev lige efter kunde fik en hjerneblødning
OG TAGER VI ET SPØRGSMÅL AF GANGEN
LYVER JYSKE BANK ?
NÆGTER JYSKE BANK AT SVARE FOR AT KUNNE FORTSÆTTE BEDRAGERI
Læs bilag her, mere kommer til.
Jo højere op i pyramiden vi kommer jo tætter på bagmænd er vi
Skrevet som opråb og med humor
Er Lund Elmer Sandager advokater hæderlig eller er de lige så uhæderlige som jyske bank.
SÅDAN SKAL KUNDER KÆMPE IMOD JYSKE BANK.
FOR AT STOPPE BANKENS BEDRAGERI
EN BESTYRELSE DER HANDLER DIRÆKTE MOD JYSKE BANKS VEDTÆGTER
Velkommen til banken som Anders Dam og bestyrelsen der styrer DIRÆKTE imod bankens egne vedtægter §. 1 Stk. 4. og 5.
Altså med mindre denne sag er et spejlbilled af bankens holdning over for deres kunder.
§. 1 Stk. 4: Bankens formål er som bank at drive bankvirksomhed efter lovgivningen.
§. 1 Stk. 5: Banken drives i overensstemmelse med redelig forretningsskik, bankens værdier og holdninger.
Spørgsmålet er så om Jyske Banks koncernledelsen kan leve op til lovgivningen og deres vedtægter, som at være REDLIG, eller er det for svært at overholde.
LUND ELMER SANDAGER I BAGGRUNDEN
En lille bedrageri sag som Koncernledelsen i jyske bank ikke vil hjælpe kunder med at opklare.
Hvem har ansvaret når banker bedrager.
Alle i jyske bank og havkatten modarbejder, at kunden må få svar på nogle spørgsmål.
Og jyske bank gør da også alt, for at spænde ben for kunden i jagten på sandheden
Så enkelt som at spærre kunden ude fra facesbook gruppe Havkatten, benytter jyske bank sig af bare for at lukke munden på den bedraget kunde.
Som enkelt handler om, først et lån på 4.328.000 kr
Et lån på 4.328.000 kr. jyske bank påstår kunde har optaget
Og derefter rentebyttet af dette lån med jyske bank.
Husk at læse jyske banks svarskrift 10-09-2018, og sammenlign med disse bilag
Advokat Mette Egholm Nielsen nægtede først at svare DIRÆKTE og da sket ikke underskrive noget
Men noget stemmer ikke, for det første findes der intet lån.
Så hvordan tolker man bestyrelsens og advokatens svar 31-05-2016
Igen 31 maj og ved fortsat vildning på kundes anmodning 25 maj, til Andets Dam bestyrelsen og advokater, om at få bevist at kunde har lånt de 4.328.000 kr jyske bank påstår, hertil oplyser partner Philip Baruch at kunden har fået udbetalt det lån kunde forgæves har anmodet at jyske bank beviste
Jyske Banks svar på blandt andet mail af 25-05-2016
PROBLEMET ER BARE AT ALLE MEDVIRKENDE, SÅ SOM BESTYRELSEN I JYSKE BANK
DERES ADVOKATER LYVER
OG HAR LØJET FRA DAG 1
Kunden må ikke opklare at jyske bank bare udsætter familie for udnyttelse ved tvang og svindel.
SÅDAN UDSÆTTER JYSKE BANK KUNDER FOR SVINDEL
LÆS MERE PÅ
LÆS MERE PÅ LINKET BANKNYT KLIK PÅ EN ANSAT I BANKEN, ALLE VED HVAD VI ER UDSAT FOR.
Kunde ønsker dialog
Ønsker jyske bank ikke også dialog
Som at kunden ikke må opklare at jyske bank bare udsætter kunde for svindel, med lån der ikke findes.
DER FINDES INTET LÅN NOGET STED PÅ 4.328.000 kr.
Er det derfor lederen i jyske bank CEO Anders Christian Dam nægter dialog og vise kunden bevis på at kunden har optaget det lån i Nykredit som jyske Banks ansatte har bildt han ind siden 2008/2009